International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Seventh- and Eighth-Generation Self-etch Dentin Bonding Agents in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study

Ankur Mishra, Monika Koul, Ahsan Abdullah

Citation Information : Mishra A, Koul M, Abdullah A. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Seventh- and Eighth-Generation Self-etch Dentin Bonding Agents in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020; 13 (3):225-229.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1765

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 14-10-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: To compare the shear bond strength of seventh- and eight-generation self-etch dentin bonding agents in primary teeth using universal testing machine. Materials and methods: Forty extracted sound human primary molars were collected and randomly divided into two groups of 20 sample each. Shear bond strength of seventh-generation bonding agent [ADPER Single Bond Universal, (group II)] and eighth-generation bonding agent [Futurabond DC, VOCO Germany, (group I)] were calculated by using Universal Testing Machine (PTC/O83/ME, INSTRON, USA) and expressed in megapascals (MPa). Recorded data were compiled and subjected to statistical analysis using Student's t test. Results: The mean shear bond strength of group I (eighth-generation dentin bonding agent) and group II (seventh-generation dentin bonding agent) ranged from 22.10 to 37.10 MPa and 19.80 to 30.30 MPa, respectively Student's t test showed significantly different and higher (8.7%) shear bond strength in group I when compared to group II (p value = 0.017). Conclusion: Shear bond strength of eighth-generation dentin bonding agent (Futurabond DC) was better than seventh-generation dentin bonding agent (Adper Single Bond Universal). Clinical significance: An effective bond to tooth would reduce marginal microleakage, bacterial penetration, postoperative sensitivity, possibility of pulpal inflammation, and preserve tooth structure by allowing minimal cavity preparation.


PDF Share
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.