International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness and Patient Acceptance of Hall Technique for Managing Carious Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study

Puneet M Khari

Citation Information : Khari PM. Evaluation of Clinical Effectiveness and Patient Acceptance of Hall Technique for Managing Carious Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (6):548-552.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1699

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 25-11-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Introduction: Hall technique (HT) is a biological approach where decay is sealed under preformed metal crowns without any caries removal, tooth preparation or local anesthesia. Dental caries is one of the most common prevailing chronic condition that affect both adults and children. Since children are anxious and apprehensive to dental treatment, their uncooperative behavior might cause hindrance in the treatment, which often leads to manage them in general anesthesia. To better address the dental care needs in pediatric patients, dental surgeons require some alternatives for management of caries and restorative treatment in children. The Hall technique is one such conservative treatment approach developed by Dr Norna Hall in 1980s. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and patient acceptance of Hall technique for managing carious primary molars. Materials and methods: 84 children in the age group 6–10 years with class I and class II carious lesions limited to dentin were selected for the study. Occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) was measured preoperatively, postoperatively and after 6 months. Discomfort level was assessed by facial pain rating scale and by questionnaires filled on the day of placement of SS crown, 1 week after placement and 6 months after placement. Results: The Hall technique was found to be successful, as there was no failure clinically as well as radiographically within 6 months of placement of SS crown. The increased OVD postoperatively returned to its normal values within 6 months, the mean change in the OVD was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The Hall technique proved to be clinically effective and acceptable by maximum number of children.

PDF Share
  1. Moses J, Rangeeth BN, Gurunathan D. Prevalence of dental caries, socio-economic status and treatment needs among 5 to 15 year old school going children of Chidambaram. J Clin Diagn Res 2011;5(1): 146–151.
  2. Ludwig KH, Fontana M, Vinson LA, et al. The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the hall technique: a retrospective study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145(12):1248–1253. DOI: 10.14219/jada.2014.89.
  3. Verde AV, Ramos MM, Stoneham AM. Benefits in cost and reduced discomfort of new techniques of minimally invasive cavity treatment. J Dent Res 2009;88(4):297–299. DOI: 10.1177/0022034509334157.
  4. Chadwick BL, Evans DJ. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2007;8(1):14–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262565.
  5. Innes NP, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, et al. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice—a retrospective analysis. Br Dent J 2006;200(8): 451–454. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466.
  6. Van der Zee V, Van Amerongen WE. Short communication: influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11(5):225–227. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262751.
  7. Innes N, Evans D, Stewart M, et al. The hall technique: a minimalintervention, child centered approach to managing the carious primary molar A Users Manual, Version 4; 2015.
  8. Kaur R, Jindal R, Dua R, et al. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of audio and audiovisual distraction aids in the management of anxious pediatric dental patients. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2015;33(3):192–203. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.160357.
  9. Topaloglu-Ak A, Eden E, Frencken JE. Perceived dental anxiety among school children treated through three caries removal approaches. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15(3):235–240. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572007000300015.
  10. Hussein I. The hall technique: the novel method in restoring the carious primary molar that is challenging old concepts. A new tool in the general dentist's toolbox. Dental Tribune Middle East & Afr 2015; 18–20.
  11. Santamaría RM, Pawlowitz L, Schmoeckel J, et al. Use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars in Germany: questionnaire-based cross-sectional analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent 2018;28(6):587–594. DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12415.
  12. Santamaría RM, Innes N. Sealing carious tissue in primary teeth using crowns: the hall technique. In: Caries excavation: evolution of treating cavitated carious lesions, vol. 27. Karger Publishers; 2018. pp. 113–123.
  13. Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, et al. Alternative caries management options for primary molars: 2.5-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 2017;51(6):605–614. DOI: 10.1159/000477855.
  14. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. The hall technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health 2007;7(1):18. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-7-18.
  15. Clark W, Geneser M, Owais A, et al. Success rates of hall technique crowns in primary molars: a retrospective pilot study. Gen Dent 2017;65(5):32–35.
  16. Page LA, Boyd DH, Davidson SE, et al. Acceptability of the hall technique to parents and children. N Z Dent J 2014;110(1):12–27.
  17. BaniHani A, Deery C, Toumba J, et al. Effectiveness, costs and patient acceptance of a conventional and a biological treatment approach for carious primary teeth in children. Caries Res 2019;53:65–75. DOI: 10.1159/000487201.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.