International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Resin Infiltration of Artificial Enamel Lesions: Evaluation of Penetration Depth, Surface Roughness and Color Stability

RajaSagi Aswani, Vinay Chandrappa

Citation Information : Aswani R, Chandrappa V. Resin Infiltration of Artificial Enamel Lesions: Evaluation of Penetration Depth, Surface Roughness and Color Stability. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (6):520-523.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1692

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 24-11-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: To evaluate the penetration depth, surface roughness, and color stability of resin infiltration restoration of artificial enamel lesions induced in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and methods: Primary (group I, n = 30) and permanent (group II, n = 30) extracted non-carious human anterior teeth were subjected to demineralization for four days after creating a window of 5 mm × 5 mm on the labial surfaces. Demineralized area was infiltrated with the low viscosity resin. Ten samples from each group were evaluated for penetration depth, surface roughness, and color stability, respectively. Penetration depth was determined using a stereomicroscope at 80× magnification. Surface roughness of sound and infiltrated enamel was recorded using a profilometer. The color stability was assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks along with baseline values using vita easy shade spectrophotometer. Results: Data were analyzed using the student “t” test and Friedman test. The degree of resin penetration was observed to be higher in primary teeth (32.6 ± 15.72 μm) compared to permanent teeth (24.23 ± 6.85 μm), but no significant difference was found (p = 0.138). Surface roughness values of resin infiltrated enamel is similar to that of sound enamel in both primary (p = 0.617) and permanent teeth (p = 0.234). The mean color stability scores immediately after resin infiltration at 2, 4, and 8 weeks intervals showed no statistically significant difference in primary (p = 0.998) and permanent teeth (p = 0.213). Conclusion: Resin penetration into enamel lesions was more in primary teeth enamel compared to permanent. The early enamel lesions, when treated with resin infiltration, showed surface characteristics similar to sound enamel and also exhibited acceptable color up to 8 weeks duration. Clinical significance: Resin infiltration can be considered as an effective and predictable treatment option for the restoration of early enamel lesions owing to its deeper penetration, provision of better surface characteristics, and reliable masking of white spot lesions in both primary and permanent dentitions.

PDF Share
  1. Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res 1977;11(5):277–286. DOI: 10.1159/000260279.
  2. Kohn WG, Collins AS, Cleveland JL, et al. Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings—2003. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52(RR-17):1–61.
  3. Kumar VL, Itthagarun A, King NM. The effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of artificial caries-like lesions: an in vitro study. Aust Dent J 2008;53(1):34–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00006.x.
  4. Manji F, Fejerskov O, Nagelkerke NJ, et al. A random effects model for some epidemiological features of dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991;19(6):324–328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1991.tb00180.x.
  5. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V. Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res 2003;82(2):117–122. DOI: 10.1177/154405910308200208.
  6. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Masking of labial enamel white spot lesions by resin infiltration--a clinical report. Quintessence Int 2009;40(9):713–718.
  7. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Kielbassa AM. Surface layer erosion of natural caries lesions with phosphoric and hydrochloric acid gels in preparation for resin infiltration. Caries Res 2007;41(3):223–230. DOI: 10.1159/000099323.
  8. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Mueller J, et al. Influence of the application time on the penetration of different dental adhesives and a fissure sealant into artificial subsurface lesions in bovine enamel. Dent Mater 2006;22(1):22–28. DOI: 10.1016/
  9. Robinson C, Brookes SJ, Kirkham J, et al. In vitro studies of the penetration of adhesive resins into artificial caries-like lesions. Caries Res 2001;35(2):136–141. DOI: 10.1159/000047445.
  10. Turska-szybka A, Lewandowska M, Olczak-kowalczyk D, et al. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions on smooth surfaces of primary teeth – in vitro studies. Dent Med Probl 2014;51(3): 308–317.
  11. Subramaniam P, GirishBabu KL, Lakhotia D. Evaluation of penetration depth of a commercially available resin infiltrate into artificially created enamel lesions: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(2):146–149. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.128054.
  12. Burgess JO, Cakir D Surface roughness determination of a caries infiltrant resin. Data on file. Hamburg, Germany: DMG; 2009.
  13. Taher NM, Alkhamis HA, Dowaidi SM. The influence of resin infiltration system on enamel microhardness and surface roughness: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J 2012;24(2):79–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.10.003.
  14. Yuan H, Li J, Chen L, et al. Esthetic comparison of white-spot lesion treatment modalities using spectrometry and fluorescence. Angle Orthod 2014;84(2):343–349. DOI: 10.2319/032113- 232.1.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.