Introduction: The foundation for healthy permanent teeth in children and teenagers is laid during the first few years of life. Toothbrushing should be presented as a habit. A wide array of toothbrushes is available in the market, which differ in size, design, length, hardness, arrangement of bristles. This present clinical study is undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of ionic toothbrush on oral hygiene status and plaque removal. Materials and methods: A total of 30 children aged 6 years to 12 years were selected in this study. The children were divided into two groups, 15 children were given HyG ionic toothbrush, were instructed how to use product according to manufacturer's instructions, 15 children were assigned to use manual toothbrush, instructed to brush their teeth in usual manner. All subjects used the same commercially available dentifrice throughout the study. Results: The results were evaluated at each visit day 0, day 15 and day 30 following 12–18 hours of no oral hygiene. The subjects brushed their teeth twice daily for 1 minute under supervision. The result showed that there was significant difference in all the mean values in all the parameters. It may be concluded from the present study that though the ionic toothbrush was insignificantly superior to the manual toothbrush, both the toothbrushes are clinically effective in removing plaque and improving the gingival conditions.
Grewal N, Kaur M. Status of oral health awareness in India children as compared to Western children: (A pilot study). J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2007;25(1):15–19. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.31983.
Grossman E, Proskin H. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of an electric and a manual children's toothbrush. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:469–474. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0232.
Rugg-Gunn AJ, MacGregor DM. A survey of toothbrushing behaviour in children and young adults. J Periodontal Res 1978;13:382–389. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1978.tb00193.x.
Sasan D, Thomas B, et al. Tooth brush selection: a dilemma? Indian J Dent Res 2006;17(4):167–170. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.29869.
Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, et al. Dietary habits and oral health related behaviors in relation to DMFT indexes of a group of young adult patients attending a dental school. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13(12):E800–E807.
Hellastadius K, Asman B, et al. Improved maintenance of plaque control by electrical toothbrushing in periodontitis patients with low compliance. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:235–237. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00350.x.
Mclnnes C, Johnson B, et al. Clinical and computerassisted evaluations of the stain removal ability of the Sonicare electronic toothbrush. J Clin Dent 1994;5:13–18.
Ash MM. A review of the problems and results of studies on manual and power toothbrushes. J Periodontol 1964;35:202–213. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1918.104.22.168.
Heasman PA, Mc Craken GI. Powered toothbrushes: A review of clinical trials. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:407–420. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260701.x.
Ciancio SG. Plaque control. Periodontology. 2000;1995(8):7–9; Ritsert EF, Binns WH., Jr Adolescents brush better with an electric toothbrush. J Dent Child 1967;34:354–358.
Maki Y, Sughara N, et al. Plaque removing effectiveness of toothbrush employing the lithium battery. Shikwa Gakuho 1993;93: 561–574.
Maki Y, Sughara N, et al. Plaque removing effectiveness of toothbrushemploying the lithium battery. Shikwa Gakuho 1993;93:561–574.
Van Swol RL, Van Scotter DE, et al. Clinical evaluationof an ionic toothbrush in the removal of established plaque and reductionof gingivitis. Quintessence Int 1996;27:389–394.