International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Rugoscopy as a Gender Determination Tool and its Appositeness in Malocclusion among Adolescents Aged 13–18 Years

Sunaina Pamnani, Murali K Dindukurthi, Sindura Allani

Keywords : Palatal rugae, Rugoscopy, Sagittal skeletal jaw relation, Skeletal malocclusion

Citation Information : Pamnani S, Dindukurthi MK, Allani S. Rugoscopy as a Gender Determination Tool and its Appositeness in Malocclusion among Adolescents Aged 13–18 Years. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (4):307-311.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1642

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-08-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between malocclusion and palatal rugae patterns and its reliability in gender determination of adolescents aged 13–18 years. Materials and methods: A total of 90 children with 30 in each of skeletal class I, II and III groups respectively were included in the study. The lateral cephalograms of the study samples were analyzed cephalometrically using ANB angle, WITS appraisal and beta angle and categorized as skeletal class I, class II or class III sagittal skeletal jaw relation. Sassouni\'s Archial analysis was used to reconfirm skeletal jaw relation and also to assess treatment needs. Palatal rugae of each sample were recorded to study the patterns. Thomas and Kotze classification was followed for rugae pattern analysis. Results: No definite rugae print pattern could be associated with any particular sagittal skeletal jaw relation in the present study. Female population of class II skeletal malocclusion showed a significant difference for number of rugae on the right and left sides of mid palatine raphe. Discriminant function analysis showed no significance when the number of rugae were compared among males and females for gender determination. Conclusion: As rugoscopy was neither found to provide absolute conclusive evidence in identification of any particular jaw relationship nor gender determination, combination with more reliable forensic methods would help in better personal identification. Clinical significance: Palatal rugae and craniofacial skeleton develop at the same embryonic period. Developmental factors that cause malocclusions should also reflect in the palatal rugae patterns. There exists a deficiency in studies in samples of younger age group and hence the need of the study.


PDF Share
  1. Ohtani M, Nishida N, et al. Indication and Limitation of usingpalatal rugae for Personal Identification in Edentulous Cases. Forensic Sci Int 2008;176:178–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.09.002.
  2. Krishnappa S, Srinath S, et al. Palatal Rugoscopy: Implementation in Forensic Odontology-A Review. J Adv Med Dent Scie 2013;1(2):53–59.
  3. Patil MS, Patil SB, et al. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry: a review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139: 1471–1478. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0072.
  4. Sivaraj A. Significance of rugae in orthodontics. J Orofac Res 2013;3(3):202–209.
  5. Buchtová M, Tichy F, et al. The development of palatal rugae in the European pine vole, Microtus subterraneus (Arvicolidae, Rodentia). Folia Zoo 2003;52:127–136.
  6. Sadler TW. Langman's Medical Embryology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1990. pp. 316–320.
  7. Kanematsu N, Yoshida Y, et al. Study on abnormalities in the appearance of finger and palm prints in children with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;14:74–82. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0503(86)80265-X.
  8. Tikare S, Rajesh G, et al. Dermatoglyphics - A marker for malocclusion? Int Dent J 2010;60(4):300–304.
  9. Kulkarni N, Vasudevan SD, et al. Cheiloscopy: A new role as a marker of sagittal jaw relation. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:6–12. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.99152.
  10. Gandikota C, Venkata YP, et al. Comparative study of palatal rugae pattern in class II div 1 and class I individuals. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2012;4:358–363. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.100271.
  11. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal rugae pattern: a new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38(3):153–157.
  12. Jordanov JA. Growth of the hard palate in man. Anthropological characteristics. Z Morphol Anthropol 1971;63:230–237.
  13. Almeida MA, Phillips C, et al. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod 1995;65:43–48.
  14. Limson KS, Julian R. Computerized recording of the palatal rugae pattern and an evaluation of its application in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2004;22(1):1–4.
  15. Virdi M, Singh Y, et al. Role of palatal rugae in forensic identification of the pediatric population. Internet J Forensic Sci 2009;4(2):1–6.
  16. Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: The Beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:100–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.026.
  17. Oral E, Kutalm S, et al. Evaluation of palatal rugae pattern in different sagittal skeletal relationship adolescent subjects. Medicine 2017;96(14):1–4. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006440.
  18. Suhartono AW, Syafitri K, et al. Palatal rugae patterning in a modern Indonesian population. Int J Legal Med 2016;130:881–887. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1272-5.
  19. Deval A, Gunjan Y, et al. Palatal rugoscopy and dermatoglyphics: a Marker for malocclusion and its Specificity in sexes? University J Dent Sci 2016;2(2):34–40.
  20. Kapali S, Townsend G, et al. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129–133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00110.x.
  21. Saraf A, Bedia S, et al. Rugae patterns as an adjunct to sex differentiation in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2011;29(1):14–19.
  22. Dohke M, Osato S. Morphological study of the palatal rugae in Japanese 1. Bilateral differences in the regressive evaluation of the palatal rugae. Jap J Oral Biol 1994;36:125–140. DOI: 10.2330/joralbiosci1965.36.126.
  23. Ahmed AA, Hamid A. Morphological Study of Palatal Rugae in a Sudanese Population. Int J Dent 2015; 1–8. DOI: 10.1155/2015/650648.
  24. Mustafa AG, Allouh M, et al. Morphometric analysis of palatal rugae among Jordanians: further evidence of worldwide palatal rugae individuality. Aust J Forensic Sci 2014;46(1):53–63. DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2013.804947.
  25. Goyal S, Goyal S. Study of palatal rugae pattern of Rwandan patients attending the dental department at King Faisal hospital, Kigali, Rwanda: a preliminary study. Rwanda Med J 2013;70(1):19–25.
  26. Fahmi FM, Al-Shamrani SM, et al. Rugae pattern in a Saudi population sample of males and females. Saudi Dent J 2001;13(2):92–95.
  27. Kallianpur S, Desai A, et al. An anthropometric analysis of facial height, arch length, and palatal rugae in the Indian and Nepalese population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3(3):33–37. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.85294.
  28. Kumar S, Vezhavandhan, et al. Palatal rugoscopy among Puducherry population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):401–404. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1158.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.