International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on Polymerization of Elastomeric Materials: An Ex Vivo Randomized Controlled Trial

Moez I Khakiani, Hemal V Pandya, Tousif I Nathani, Priya Verma

Keywords : Dentin bonding agent, Elastomers, Immediate dentin sealing, Oxygen inhibition layer

Citation Information : Khakiani MI, Pandya HV, Nathani TI, Verma P. Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on Polymerization of Elastomeric Materials: An Ex Vivo Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (4):288-292.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1657

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

Statement of problem: Interactions are suspected between resin coating and elastomeric impression material. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify possible interactions between two impression materials and resin-coated tooth surfaces. Materials and methods: Extracted molars (n = 10) underwent 1 of the 4 procedures: control group (unsealed tooth surface/impression); IDS group (immediate dentin sealing/impression); IDS/AB group (immediate dentin sealing/air blocking/impression); IDS/AB-P group (immediate dentin sealing/air blocking/pumicing/impression). Dentin bonding agents used were Adper single bond 2 and Clearfil SE bond. Impression materials used were Impregum Soft (polyether) and Aquasil (A silicone). A stereomicroscope was used to detect any residual impression material on the bonded tooth surface. Results: The IDS group showed 100% faulty impressions. Air blocking the resin coating did not completely eliminate the oxygen-inhibited layer of Adper single bond 2. Clearfil SE Bond along with Aquasil generated ideal impressions in group IDS/AB, while all other combinations resulted in faulty impressions. The IDS/AB-P group yielded ideal impressions with Aquasil but generated faulty impressions with Impregum soft in most specimens. Conclusion: Immediate dentin sealing should be followed by air blocking and pumicing to generate ideal impressions with Aquasil (A silicone). Impregum Soft (polyether) is not recommended in combination with immediate dentin sealing.


PDF Share
  1. Pashley EL, Comer RW, et al. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13–20.
  2. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, et al. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115–119.
  3. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536–545.
  4. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033–1042. DOI: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x.
  5. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111–121.
  6. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144–154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x.
  7. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:275–281. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.37.
  8. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, et al. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15: 105–113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x.
  9. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, et al. The effect of a “resin coating” on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003;28:28–35.
  10. Magne P, Kim TH, et al. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511–519. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010.
  11. Islam MR, Takada T, et al. Effect of resin coating on adhesion of composite crown restoration. Dent Mater J 2006;25:272–279. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.25.272.
  12. Magne P, So WS, et al. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166–174. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3.
  13. Okuda M, Nikaido T, et al. Microtensile bond strengths to cavity floor dentin in indirect composite restorations using resin coating. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:38–46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00062.x.
  14. Lee JI, Park SH. The effect of three variables on shear bond strength when luting a resin inlay to dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:288–292. DOI: 10.2341/08-82.
  15. Swift Jr EJ. Critical appraisal: immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21:62–67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00232.x.
  16. Pashley EL, Comer RW, et al. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13–20.
  17. Eliades GC, Caputo AA. The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:31–38. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90104-2.
  18. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652–1658. DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690100501.
  19. Erickson RL. Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1989;2:117–123.
  20. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, et al. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 2005;30:747–757.
  21. Magne P, Nielsen B. Interactions between impression materials and immediate dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:298–305. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60178-5.
  22. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, et al. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:133–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00985.x.
  23. Lin CP, Douglas WH. Structure-property relations and crack resistance at the bovine dentin-enamel junction. J Dent Res 1994;73:1072–1078. DOI: 10.1177/00220345940730050901.
  24. Lawson NC, Burgess JO, et al. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008;20:186–193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00176.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.