International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Radiographic Evaluation of the Hyoid Bone Position and Pharyngeal Airway Depth in Anteroposterior Dysplasia

Rajat Chauhan, Dinesh Kumar Bagga, Poonam Agrawal, Hiten Kalra, Anoop Singh

Keywords : Anteroposterior dysplasia, Cephalometric radiographs, Hyoid bone, Pharyngeal airway, Skeleton malocclusion

Citation Information : Chauhan R, Bagga DK, Agrawal P, Kalra H, Singh A. Radiographic Evaluation of the Hyoid Bone Position and Pharyngeal Airway Depth in Anteroposterior Dysplasia. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12 (2):101-106.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1601

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-09-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Introduction: The pharyngeal airway, tongue, and hyoid bone are correlated. The hyoid bone is connected to the pharynx, mandible, and cranium through muscles and ligaments and its position with respect to them determines the tongue posture and function. It also plays an important role in maintaining the airway and upright natural head position. Different skeletal patterns have different morphologies and shapes of the mandible, which might be affected by the position of the hyoid bone and the pharyngeal airway depth. This cephalometric study was conducted to relate the pharyngeal airway depth and the hyoid bone position of different skeletal patterns in sagittal dimension, and it determines and compares the linear parameters of the pharyngeal airway depth in Class I, II, and III malocclusion groups and anteroposterior, vertical, and angular positions of the hyoid bone positions in Class I, II, and III malocclusion groups. Materials and methods: Lateral cephalometric radiographs selected for study were divided into three groups of 30 samples each based on ANB angle and ? angle into skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III, respectively. Five linear measurements for the pharyngeal airway depth, four linear measurements for anteroposterior position, two linear measurements for vertical position, and one angular measurement for angular hyoid bone position were made. Results: The pharyngeal airway depth was found to show no statistically significant difference between Class I and Class III malocclusions. The pharyngeal airway depth in Class II malocclusion was found to be statistically smaller at D1 as compared to that in Class I and Class III malocclusions, whereas it remained the same at the rest of the locations measured, i.e., D2, D3, D4, and D5. The Class III malocclusion group showed a significant statistical difference in the anteroposterior hyoid bone position at all levels (i.e., H1, H2, H3, and H4) as compared to the Class II malocclusion group, whereas it showed a statistically significant difference as compared to the Class I malocclusion group at H1 and H3. The angular inclination of the hyoid bone in the Class II malocclusion group showed a statistically significant difference with the Class I and Class III malocclusion group but the Class III malocclusion group showed no significant difference statistically when compared to the Class I malocclusion group. Conclusion: The pharyngeal airway depth in the Class II malocclusion group was also found to be narrower at the superiormost level measured at the posterior nasal spine from the posterior pharyngeal wall. The hyoid bone position was variable in angular and anteroposterior dimensions among different malocclusion groups.

PDF Share
  1. Dunn GF, Green LJ, et al. Relationships between variation of mandibular morphology and variation of nasopharyngeal airway size in monozygotic twins. Angle Orthod 1973;43:129–135. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1973)043<0129:RBVOMM>2.0.CO;2.
  2. McNamara JA Jr. Inf luence of respi ratory pat tern on craniofacial growth. Angle Or thod 1981;51:269–300. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0269:IORPOC>2.0.CO;2.
  3. Ceylan I, Oktay H. A study on the pharyngeal size in different skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:69–75.
  4. Solow B, Siersbaek S, et al. Airway adequacy, head posture, and craniofacial morphology. Am J Orthod 1984;86:214–223.
  5. Sheng CM, Lin LH, et al. Developmental changes in pharyngeal airway depth and hyoid bone position from childhood to adulthood. Angle Orthod 2009;79:484–490. DOI: 10.2319/062308-328.1.
  6. Chauhan A, Autar R, et al. Comparison of pharyngeal airway dimension, tongue and hyoid bone position based on ANB angle. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2015;6(1):42–51. DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.168237.
  7. Jenaa AK, Duggal R. Hyoid bone position in subjects with different vertical jaw dysplasias. Angle Orthod 2011;81:81–85. DOI: 10.2319/092208-491.1.
  8. Kjellberg H. Juvenile chronic arthritis. Dentofacial morphology, growth, mandibular function and orthodontic treatment. Swed Dent J Suppl 1995;109:1–56.
  9. Stratemann S, Huang JC, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the airway with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:607–615. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.049.
  10. Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:100–105. DOI: 10.1016/S0889540604002483.
  11. Zhonga Z, Tangb Z, et al. A comparison study of upper airway among different skeletal craniofacial patterns in nonsnoring Chinese children. Angle Orthod 2010;80:267–274. DOI: 10.2319/061917-399.12.
  12. Kerr WJ. The nasopharynx, face height and overbite. Angle Orthod 1985;55(1):31–36. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1985)055<0031:TNFHAO> 2.0.CO;2.
  13. Alves Jr M, Franzotti ES, et al. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:814–819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.01.015.
  14. Ang PK, Sandham A, et al. Craniofacial morphology and head posture in Chinese subjects with obstructive sleep apnea. Semin Orthod 2004;10:90–96.
  15. Freitas MR, Alcazar NMP, et al. Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with class I and class II malocclusions and different growth patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:742–745. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.033.
  16. Reddy R, Chunduri R, et al. Upper and Lower Pharyngeal Airways In Subjects With Skeletal Class-I, Class-II & Class-III Malocclusions And Different Growth Patterns – A Cephalometric Study. Int J Contemp Dent 2011;2(5):12–18.
  17. Adamidis IP, Meropi N. Spyropoulos hyoid bone position orientation in class I and class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;101:308–312. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80323-3.
  18. Kuroda T, Nunota E, et al. A roentgenocephalometric study on the position of the hyoid bone. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1966;13:227–243.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.