International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2018 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Visible Enamel Defects in Adolescents: How Do their Peers View Them?

Ullal A Nayak, Apurva Pawar, Damodhar Kappadi, Deepesh Prajapati, Kangkan J Roy

Keywords : Enamel defects, Judgements,Dental appearance

Citation Information : Nayak UA, Pawar A, Kappadi D, Prajapati D, Roy KJ. Visible Enamel Defects in Adolescents: How Do their Peers View Them?. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018; 11 (6):479-482.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1561

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 00-12-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim: The present study was aimed to determine whether adolescents make social judgments about other children who have noticeable enamel imperfections. Materials and methods: Two schools with very different socioeconomic profiles were selected using a stratified random sampling method. Children aged 13–14 years (school class 9) and 15–16 (school class 11) were randomly selected from these schools totaling to a sample size of 200. Half the participants rated full-face photographs of a boy and girl without an enamel defect, and the other half-rated the same two photographs with the digitally modified incisors. The photographic subjects were rated on a four-point Likert\'s scale consisting of six positive and five negative descriptors. Results: Based on the gender of the photographic subject, the mean total attribute score was almost identical. However, it was lower for photographic subjects showing enamel defects as compared to those without. Conclusion: The dental appearance can influence value judgments in children. Clinical significance: It is important to treat the enamel lesions and various developmental defects of the enamel as it may lead to a negative social judgment by peers.


PDF Share
  1. Dion KK. Physical attractiveness and evaluations of children's transgressions. J Pers Soc Psychol 1972;24(2):207-213.
  2. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981;79(4):399-415.
  3. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, et al. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985; 87(1):21-26.
  4. Feng XP, Newton JT, Robinson PG. The impact of dental appearance on perceptions of personal characteristics among Chinese people in the United Kingdom. Int Dent J 2001;51(4) 282-286.
  5. Newton JT, Prabhu N, Robinson PG. The impact of dental appearance on the appraisal of personal characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(4):429-434.
  6. Shaw WC, Humphreys S. Influence of children's dentofacial appearance on teacher expectations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1982;10(6):313-319.
  7. Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2000;126(3):390.
  8. Patel A, Rodd HD, Baker SR, et al. Are social judgements made by children in relation to orthodontic appliances? J Orthod 2010;37(2):93-99.
  9. Kershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM. The influence of tooth colour on the perceptions of personal characteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayed and ‘whitened’ teeth. Br Dent J 2008;204(5):E9.
  10. Henson ST, Lindauer SJ, Gardner WG, et al. Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 2011;140(3):389-395.
  11. Craig SA, Baker SR, Rodd HD. How do children view other children who have visible enamel defects? Int J Paediatr Dent 2015;25(6):399-408.
  12. Rodd HD, Barker C, Baker SR, et al. Social judgements made by children in relation to visible incisor trauma. Dent Traumatol 2010;26(1):2-8.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.