RESEARCH ARTICLE | https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2081 |
Assessment of Oral Health Status in Epileptic Children and Healthy Children in Bengaluru City: A Comparative Study
1Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
2,3Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
4Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, VS Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Corresponding Author: Rajnish K Verma, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, Phone: +91 9620513937, e-mail: rajnishkverma2014@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder, which is identified by repeated episodes of abnormal synchronous discharge of brain, resulting in several types of deficits. A percentage of them also have mental and motor deficits. Both the epileptic conditions and their medical management can influence oral health.
Objective: To assess and to compare the oral health status of epileptic children and the healthy children in Bengaluru city.
Material and methodology: Data was collected from the study group, which included 100 children between age-group 5 and 16 years registered under the Department of Neurology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health (IGICH). Data collected from healthy children as control group and they visited Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, VS Dental College & Hospital (VSDCH) for routine dental check-up. All subjects were examined by single qualified examiner. Gingival Index, plaque index, decayed missing filled teeth for primary teeth (dmft) and for permanent teeth (DMFT) were recorded for both study and control group. Other findings were also recorded such as injury to dentition or oral soft tissues and gingival hyperplasia as side effect of antiepileptic drug therapy.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference found in dmft and DMFT between control group and study group. But, there was significant difference present in dmft and DMFT on gender basis between control and study group.
Conclusion: The group of children with epilepsy suffer from several oral health problems such as dental caries, gingival enlargement, periodontal disease, and injuries of the oral cavity, which are associated with seizure-related trauma.
How to cite this article: Tiwari S, Verma RK, Dhull KS, et al. Assessment of Oral Health Status in Epileptic Children and Healthy Children in Bengaluru City: A Comparative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(6):768–773.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
Keywords: DMFT, dmft, Epilepsy, Gingival hyperplasia, Gingival health, Plaque Index, Seizures
INTRODUCTION
Oral health is a major threat to general health. In children who suffer from systemic disease, oral health is commonly seen as neglected aspect. Epilepsy is the commonly reported as long-standing neurologic disorder in pediatric neurology. It is distinguished by recurrent seizures, with predominant etiologies as birth injury and congenital abnormalities. In developing countries, occurrence of epilepsy is approximately 43 per 1,000 people.1 World Health Organization ranked it next to some psychiatric problems and reported that disability due to epilepsy accounts for about 1% of the global load of disease, as measured by disability-adjusted life-years.2
Epileptic children have been included under children with special needs. The federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau defines children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN) as:
“Those who have or are at increased risk for a chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional condition and who also require health and related services of a type or amount beyond that required by children generally.”3
At present, treatment for epilepsy aims to make better quality of life, by repressing seizure and prescribing medications with minimum side effects. Both the epileptic condition and anticonvulsant drugs can deteriorate oral health. Thus, monitoring of oral health for prevention and early interventions are crucial for the well-being of people with epilepsy.4 Pediatric patients of age-group &16 years are commonly included among epileptic person. A sizeable population of them also suffers mental and motor deficits.5,6 The superimposed side effects of anticonvulsant drugs over compromised ability of self-care put these children at risk of oral health.
Available literature on the overall oral health status and treatment needs of children with epilepsy, and also the seizure-related injuries of the oral cavity in children is sparse, especially in the Indian context. Therefore, aim of this study was to assess oral health status and dental treatment to compare the same with healthy children and to know dental treatment needs of epileptic children, also if epilepsy has specific effect on oral health, then to find possible reasons and measures to be taken to prevent it. Oral health is a prime aspect of life and every attempt should be made to improve it, especially in a group of epileptic children.
METHODOLOGY
This comparative study has been done to assess oral health status of epileptic children and it was carried out in Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru and Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, VS Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka. A total number of 200 children, 100 diagnosed cases of epilepsy aged 5–16 years, under regular antiepileptic drug therapy, and 100 healthy children as control group who were similar with epileptic children with regard to age and gender, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were any systemic disorder or treatment with drugs known to affect gingival or periodontal health or patients who recently undergone gingival surgery or periodontal treatment.
Institutional ethical clearance was obtained and written informed consent from the parents/guardians of the children participating in the study was obtained.
Information was gathered by same two investigators, pediatric neurologist and dentist throughout the study. Structured questionnaire was used to collect information, which included questions regarding epilepsy itself, medication history, and oral hygiene practices. Oral health examination was performed for all the subjects including the epileptic children group and healthy children group by single qualified trained examiner. The investigator himself conducted all the clinical examination with the help of recording assistant. The modified gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), and DMFT, dmft scores of epileptic children and healthy children were compared. Injury to dentition or oral soft tissue, gingival hyperplasia as side effect of antiepileptic drug therapy was recorded as present or absent in the epileptic children group. Data was collected from the healthy children group at the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, VS Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, who visited for regular dental checkup.
Each child and parent were educated and encouraged about the significance of maintaining good oral hygiene, severity, and prognosis of oral health aspects of epilepsy. During the study, all participating children were given complete dental treatment with emphasis on preventive measures. All participating children were advised regular oral health checkup once in 3 months period.
Collected data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS)version 13.0 software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) The data were expressed as mean +SD. The χ2 test was used for intra group comparison of type of epilepsy and PI or GI, type of drug administered and gingival or PI, intergroup comparisons such as brushing habits, prior dental visit. Z test was used for intergroup comparisons of parameters such as GI, PI, and treatment requirement. Mann-Whitney test was used for gender-wise comparison of PI, GI, dmft, DMFT for both study and control group.
RESULTS
Gender distribution for study group (Males—56, Females—44) was similar to control group (Males—55, Females—45). Types of epilepsy and antiepileptic drug administered are depicted in Figures 1 and 2.
Fig. 1: Types of epilepsy in the epileptic group
Fig. 2: Drug administered in the epileptic group
Statistically no significant difference was found between DMFT and dmft scores of study and control group (Table 1 and Fig. 3). Significantly higher number of teeth required restoration in study group compared to control group (p & 0.001) (Table 2 and Fig. 4). GI and PI scores of the children with epilepsy were determined to be statistically higher than control group (p & 0.001) (Table 3 and Fig. 5).
Parameter | Group | Mean | Standard deviation | SE of mean | Median | Mean difference | Z | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dmft | Epileptic | 3.70 | 3.82 | 0.38 | 3.0 | 0.530 | −0.381 | 0.703 |
Control | 3.17 | 2.86 | 0.29 | 3.0 | ||||
DMFT | Epileptic | 0.71 | 1.36 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0.227 | −0.459 | 0.646 |
Control | 0.48 | 0.97 | 0.10 | 0.0 |
*Denotes significant association
Parameter | Group | Mean | Standard deviation | SE of mean | Median | Mean difference | Z | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plaque index | Epileptic | 1.41 | 0.71 | 0.07 | 1.4 | 0.488 | −4.899 | &0.001* |
control | 0.93 | 0.53 | 0.05 | 0.7 | ||||
Gingival index | Epileptic | 0.90 | 0.73 | 0.07 | 1.0 | 0.453 | −4.354 | &0.001* |
control | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 0.3 |
*Denotes significant association
Parameter | Group | Mean | Standard deviation | SE of mean | Median | Mean difference | Z | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Restoration required (number of teeth) | Epileptic | 2.95 | 2.61 | 0.26 | 3.0 | 1.640 | −4.321 | &0.001* |
control | 1.31 | 1.21 | 0.12 | 1.0 | ||||
Root canal treatment required (number of teeth) | Epileptic | 0.95 | 1.94 | 0.19 | 0.0 | −0.540 | −3.854 | &0.001* |
control | 1.49 | 1.84 | 0.18 | 1.0 | ||||
Teeth to be extracted | Epileptic | 0.52 | 1.07 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0.100 | −0.535 | 0.592 |
control | 0.42 | 0.74 | 0.07 | 0.0 |
*Denotes significant association
Fig. 3: Mean dmft and mean DMFT in two groups
Fig. 4: Mean PI and mean GI in the two groups
Fig. 5: Mean number of teeth requiring restoration, RCT and extraction in the groups
On gender-wise comparison, no significant difference was found in dmft and DMFT scores of study group (Table 4). In control group, dmft score revealed no statistically significant difference but DMFT score was lower for female (0.27) than male (0.65) and the association was significant with p value 0.039 (Table 2). No significant difference was revealed on gender-wise comparison of GI and PI (Table 4).
Group | Gender | n | Mean | Standard deviation | SE of mean | Mean difference | Z | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dmft | Epileptic group | Male | 56 | 3.05 | 3.39 | 0.45 | −1.469 | −1.682 | 0.093 |
Female | 44 | 4.52 | 4.19 | 0.63 | |||||
Control group | Male | 55 | 3.15 | 3 | 0.4 | −0.055 | −0.242 | 0.809 | |
Female | 45 | 3.2 | 2.72 | 0.41 | |||||
DMFT | Epileptic group | Male | 56 | 0.63 | 1.2 | 0.16 | −0.189 | −0.287 | 0.774 |
Female | 43 | 0.81 | 1.56 | 0.24 | |||||
Control group | Male | 55 | 0.65 | 1.09 | 0.15 | 0.388 | −2.067 | 0.039* | |
Female | 45 | 0.27 | 0.75 | 0.11 | |||||
Plaque index | Epileptic group | Male | 56 | 1.39 | 0.74 | 0.1 | −0.061 | −0.454 | 0.65 |
Female | 44 | 1.45 | 0.68 | 0.1 | |||||
Control group | Male | 55 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 0.07 | 0.122 | −1.154 | 0.248 | |
Female | 45 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 0.08 | |||||
Gingival index | Epileptic group | Male | 56 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.1 | −0.27 | −1.79 | 0.074 |
Female | 44 | 1.05 | 0.73 | 0.11 | |||||
Control group | Male | 55 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.047 | −0.81 | 0.418 |
*Denotes significant association
No significant difference found in DMFT score of mentally retarded children compared to normal children in study group (Table 4). dmft score (4.88) of mentally retarded children was significantly higher as compared to normal children (3.12) of study (p value 0.024) (Table 4). No statistically significant difference in PI and GI scores of mentally retarded children compared to mentally fit epileptic children (Table 4) was found.
Gingival hyperplasia was documented only in two patients. Both of them were taking valproate. One patient reported history of gingival hyperplasia caused by phenytoin drug monotherapy. Hard and soft tissue injury in epileptic children were documented. Anterior teeth injury was seen in seven patients. Tooth attrition was seen in seven (7%) children of study group. Soft tissue injury was reported by 11 children in study group.
A statistically significant difference was established in the prevalence of tooth brushing between the study and control groups (Table 5). Out of 100 children, only 5 children in the study group had visited to a dentist in past in comparison to 49 in control group. The difference between the two groups was established to be statistically significant with p value &0.001 (Table 6).
Parameter | Group | Mean | Standard deviation | SE of mean | Median | Mean difference | Z | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dmft | Normal | 3.12 | 3.66 | 0.43 | 2.0 | −1.761 | −2.260 | 0.024* |
Mentally retarded | 4.88 | 3.40 | 0.67 | 5.0 | ||||
DMFT | Normal | 0.83 | 1.48 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.449 | −1.088 | 0.277 |
Mentally retarded | 0.38 | 0.94 | 0.18 | 0.0 | ||||
Plaque index | Normal | 1.39 | 0.73 | 0.09 | 1.3 | −0.129 | −0.680 | 0.496 |
Mentally retarded | 1.52 | 0.64 | 0.12 | 1.7 | ||||
Gingival index | Normal | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.08 | 1.0 | −0.260 | −1.222 | 0.222 |
Mentally retarded | 1.09 | 0.84 | 0.17 | 1.0 |
*Denotes significant association
Epileptic | Control | χ2 | p value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | |||
Brushing: | ||||||
Not daily | 11 | 11% | 3 | 3% | 6.767 | 0.034* |
Yes | 89 | 89% | 95 | 95% | ||
No | 0 | 0% | 2 | 2% | ||
Total | 100 | 100% | 100 | 100% | ||
Prior dental visit: | ||||||
Yes | 5 | 5% | 49 | 49% | 49.112 | &0.001* |
No | 95 | 95% | 51 | 51% | ||
Total | 100 | 100% | 100 | 100% |
*Denotes significant association
DISCUSSION
No statistically significant difference was documented between dmft and DMFT scores of epilepsy group compared to control group, however, scores obtained were higher for study group. Similar finding for DMFT index was obtained by Percival et al.; 7 however, he reported lower dmft scores in epileptic group than control group. The explanation given for lower incidence of caries was carefully monitored diet at the institution, where the study was conducted, preference of sugar-free antiepileptic drugs, and monitored oral hygiene practices by children. Higher caries indices in the epileptic group have been reported by Gurbuz and Tan in 4–15-year-old epileptic children compared to controls. Storhaug and Holstet (1987)8 and Rajavaara et al. (2003)9 have also found significantly higher caries index in epileptic group compared to control group.
A total of 26% epileptic children included in present study were mentally disabled. The mean dmft score of mentally disable children in study group was recorded to be significantly higher than those of mentally normal epileptic children. The higher scores could be described by restrictions in personal abilities or technical difficulties faced by this group of children due to muscular incoordination and muscle weakness obstructing oral hygiene maintenance. Gupta et al.10 also reported highest prevalence of dental caries in mentally handicapped children among other debilitating conditions. In our study, mean DMFT scores were lower for mentally retarded children than normal epileptic children; however, difference was not statistically significant. Ashley11 stated that physical and intellectual difficulties can make spitting and rinsing difficult for severe epilepsy cases. Thus, topical effect of the fluoride-containing toothpaste can be enhanced. The reason seems to be suitable explanation for the lower mean DMFT scores in mentally retarded epileptic children, also with increase in age, the formulation of medication is switched from syrup to tablet form, which might be the reason for lower severity of caries in permanent dentition. The observed higher mean values for caries indices are in all likelihood, the result of a conjunction of factors such as poor socioeconomic status of epileptic children, lower frequency of dental clinic visits, regular long-term treatment with sugar containing medicines, the tendency of parents to avoid dental treatment due to inadequate knowledge about epilepsy, and fear that dentist might provoke seizures during treatment.
Compromised periodontal condition was the most common outcome investigated during studies of oral health status of individuals with epilepsy, which was included in review of literatures. In the present study, the plaque and gingival scores were remarkably higher in the epileptic children (p value of & 0.001). These results are comparable to the results obtained by Percival et al.7 and Gurbuz and Tan.4 Plaque and gingivitis scores were higher in mentally challenged epileptic children than mentally normal epileptic children, but the difference was not significant.
Mentally challenged children suffer motor and behavioral disorder that might affect their ability to maintain oral hygiene. That can be the cause for higher plaque and gingival scores in these children. Solanki et al.12 found in their study that none of the children with mental disability had healthy periodontal status.
Gingival hyperplasia was documented in 2 out of 25 children who were on valproate monotherapy, while only one of the patients gave history of phenytoin-induced gingival hyperplasia. Ogunbodede et al.13 reported 33.3% patients receiving phenytoin monotherapy developed gingival hyperplasia, and 83.3% of patients receiving phenytoin in combination with phenobarbital manifested the disorder. The author also indicated toward possibility of potentiating effect of phenobarbital on phenytoin in causing gingival hypertrophy. According to Tan et al.,14 effect of valproate on gingival tissue is associated with interaction with medications rather than oral hygiene or inflammation. The etiology of phenytoin-induced gingival enlargement is considered to be mechanism related to interaction between phenytoin and the gingival fibroblast.10 Percival et al.7 reported gingival enlargement in 3 out of 14 children who received phenytoin in past. Gurbuz and Tan4 documented gingival enlargement in 42% of patients on valproate and 16% on phenobarbital medications. Ghafoor et al.15 have also reported gingival overgrowth as a common side effect of the antiepileptic drugs in 46% of patients.
Trauma to orodental tissue is an important finding that occurs during seizure. Ogunbodede et al.13 stated that these injuries occur due to fall as patient loses balance during seizure episode. There is also practice of placement of hard object between teeth during seizure.
In present study, anterior teeth injury was seen in seven children. Ogunbodede et al.13 in their study reported prevalence of trauma to anterior dentition as 46.4%, the reason of greater prevalence of anterior tooth trauma was reported as practice to force spoons and other articles between the teeth of patients during seizures to prevent biting of tongue. According to Tsai,16 protruded anterior teeth and increase in overjet leading to insufficient lip seal predispose to greater traumatic injury to anterior teeth. Holan et al. reported trauma of maxillary central incisors was the most common occurrence of seizure associated with fall. Percival et al.7 reported significantly higher number of epileptic children with trauma to anterior teeth compared to control. However, only few children in our study reported traumatic injury to dentition, and results are similar to findings by Gerreth and Gerreth17 who documented the incidence of traumatic dental injuries in lower number of patients.
Soft tissue injury was reported by 11 children. It has been reported that generalized tonic–clonic seizures frequently causes minor oral cavity injuries such as biting of tongue or other areas of oral mucosa. In present study, low incidence of the soft tissue injury in study group was documented. Benbadis et al.18 specified that tongue biting on lateral surface of tongue is the hallmark in epileptic children during generalized tonic–clonic seizure. Buck et al.19 stated that generalized tonic–clonic seizures frequently cause minor oral injuries. Ghafoor et al.15 reported lip/cheek biting in 74% children and tongue injury in 56% children.
A statistically significant difference was established in oral hygiene practices between study and control group (p value 0.034). 11% epileptic children were not able to brush their teeth due to motor and/or mental disability. The most striking finding was reported by Gurbuz and Tan4 who found that 76.3% of children with epilepsy in Turkey never brushed their teeth. In our study, only 4% epileptic children brushed their teeth twice in a day as compared to around 24% healthy children, which was statistically significant with p value & 0.01. The results obtained by Gurbuz and Tan4 who found that controls were more likely to be regular brushers were similar. Jovanovic and Gajic20 in their study showed that epileptic children and their parents had unacceptable attitude and behavior toward oral hygiene habits than healthy children and their parents. These epileptic children are at high risk of poor oral hygiene due to regular long-term medications that may contain sugar, and some of them also suffer mental and/or motor disorder thus the impressive oral hygiene can be difficult to achieve for children with these impairments. Epileptics have high caries prevalence and poor periodontal health in comparison to the general population. Hence, routine dental care is a must for epileptic patients. In our study, only 5% of children in the study group visited to a dentist for dental checkup in past. Lower frequency of dental visit has also been reported by Ogunbodede et al.,13 Karolyhazy et al.,21 and Gurbuz and Tan.4 A general concept among parents that dental procedures provoke seizures that restrict them to visit dentist unless severe toothache necessitate may play a role in these circumstances.4
The factors influencing oral health are complicated and, for those with epilepsy living in India are influenced by ignorance and stigma attached to epilepsy, which has made their disease more painful than the pathology. Considering evidence from other studies alongside the hurdles to oral health care potentially faced by epileptic patients, it is logical to conclude that the oral health of those with epilepsy is inferior to that of general population.
CONCLUSION
Within the limitations of present study, it can be concluded that, children with epilepsy have a poor oral health condition as compared to the healthy children. It is necessary to educate the families of patients with epilepsy to be observant of the oral hygiene condition of these patients and ensure timely visits to the dentist. A comprehensive understanding of the oral health conditions of epileptic patients is essential for the purpose of comparisons and decision-making. Dentists must take adequate care during the treatment procedures to minimize the factors that are known to trigger seizures such as avoiding the dental light being focused on the patient’s eyes, use of rubber dam during restorative treatment, and reducing anxiety. It is imperative for dentists to provide ample reassurance to the epileptic patients that they can attain good oral health.
ORCID
Kanika Singh Dhull https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-8084
REFERENCES
1. Burneo JG, Tellez-Zenteno J, Wiebe S. Understanding the burden of epilepsy in Latin America: a systematic review of its prevalence and incidence. Epilepsy Res 2005;66(1-3):63–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.07.002
2. Burneo JG, McLachlan RS. When should surgery be considered for the treatment of epilepsy? Can Med Assoc J 2005;172(09):1175–1177. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.045118
3. McPherson M, Arango P, Fox H, et al. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 1998;102:137-139. DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.1.137
4. Gurbuz T, Tan H. Oral health status in epileptic children. Pediatr Int 2010;52:279–283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02965.x
5. Bourgeois BFD. Antiepileptic drugs in pediatric practice. Epilepsia 1995;36:S34–S45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb05998.x
6. Brodie MJ, Dichter MA. Antiepileptic drugs. N Engl J Med 1996;334:168–175. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199601183340308
7. Percival T, Aylett SE, Pool F, et al. Oral health of children with intractable epilepsy attending the UK National Centre for Young People with Epilepsy. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2009;10:19–24. DOI: 10.1007/BF03262662
8. Storhaug K, Holst D. Caries experience of disabled school-age children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1987;15:144–149. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb00503.x
9. Rajavaara P, Vainionpää L, Rättyä J, et al. Tooth by tooth survival analysis of dental health in girls with epilepsy. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4:72–77.
10. Gupta DP, Chowdhury R, Sarkar T. Prevalence of dental caries in handicapped children of Calcutta. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent Mar 1993;11(01):23–27.
11. Ashley P. Toothbrushing: why when and how? Dent Update 2001;28:36–40. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2001.28.1.36
12. Solanki J, Gupta S, Arya A. Dental caries and periodontal status of mentally handicapped institutilized children. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(07);ZC25-7. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8983.4557
13. Ogunbodede EO, Adamolekun B, Akintomide AO. Oral health and dental treatment needs in Nigerian patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 1998;39(06):590–594. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01426.x
14. Tan H, Gurbuz T, Dagsuyu IM. Gingival enlargement in children treated with antiepileptics. J Child Neurol 2004;19(12):958–963. DOI: 10.1177/08830738040190120901
15. Ghafoor Fazal PA, Rafeeq M, Dubey A. Assessment of oral side effects of antiepileptic drugs and traumatic oro-facial injuries encountered in epileptic children. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(02):126–128.
16. Tsai TP. Extraction as a treatment alternative follows repeated trauma in a severely handicapped patient. Dent Traumatol 2001;17:139–142. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.017003139.x
17. Gerreth K, Gerreth P. Occurrence of oral trauma in young epileptic patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2014;15(01):13–16.
18. Benbadis SR, Wolgamuth BR, Goren H, et al. Value of tongue biting in the diagnosis of seizures. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2346–2349. DOI: 10.1001/archinate1995.00430210096015
19. Buck D, Baker GA, Smith DF, et al. Patients' experiences of injury as a result of epilepsy. Epilepsia 1997;38(04):439–444. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1997.tb01733.x
20. Jovanovic S, Gajic I. Health habits, attitudes and behavior towards oral health of children with epilepsy. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2007;135(3-4):167–173. DOI: 10.2298/sarh0704167j
21. Karolyhazy K, Kovacs E, Kivovics P, et al. Dental status and oral health of patients with epilepsy: an epidemiologic study. Epilepsia 2003;44:1103–1108. DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2003.04003.x
________________________
© The Author(s). 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.